Oscars 2019 Predictions – Best Actor

As the Oscars draw ever closer, we now find ourselves looking at one of the ‘Big Four’ categories of the night – Best Actor.

89th Annual Academy Awards - Backstage

Will win: Rami Malek (Bohemian Rhapsody)
Should win: Christian Bale (Vice)
Also nominated: Bradley Cooper (A Star is Born), Willem Dafoe (At Eternity’s Gate), Viggo Mortensen (Green Book)

What got everybody talking about Bohemian Rhapsody was the performance at the heart of the film, which saw Rami Malek give his take on the legendary Freddie Mercury. It’s earned him most acting awards going and is almost guaranteed to bag him an Oscar on Sunday, but quite honestly it is not the best performance in this category.

The problem is not necessarily with Malek, who certainly does his best – it’s more that some people cannot be imitated. There was an innate effervescence about Mercury which can’t be copied. You’re either born with it or you’re not. Bohemian Rhapsody sees Malek make a very earnest attempt to capture it, but he doesn’t quite manage to do so. The grand finale sees Malek’s Mercury take to the stage for Queen’s iconic Live Aid performance at Wembley. It’s supposed to be a momentous, climactic scene but it ultimately falls a little flat because, frankly, the real thing was better.

Malek Bohemian Rhapsody

Rami Malek gives it his best as Freddie Mercury. He’ll win an Oscar for his efforts, but he falls just short of doing the great man justice.

Chasing Malek’s shadow in this category is Christian Bale, the eponymous star of Adam McKay’s Vice. If you want to see a real masterclass in impersonation, Bohemian Rhapsody is the film for you. In Vice, however, there are no impersonations. Christian Bale doesn’t play Dick Cheney, he becomes him. The physicality, the steely gaze, the simmering menace – every nuance is there, every detail is right. He is undoubtedly the more deserving recipient of the Best Actor award, but in truth his is a performance less about acting and more about total transformation.

The other nominees in this category largely serve to make up the numbers. Willem Dafoe is perhaps the most unexpected addition for his role as Vincent van Gogh in Julian Schnabel’s dire, turgid At Eternity’s Gate. Meanwhile Viggo Mortensen does a decent enough job in Green Book but is hardly at a career best. To give him credit, Bradley Cooper is genuinely very good as the world-weary Jackson Maine in A Star is Born  (and proves he can sing just as well as he can act), and this is probably the best we’ve seen him since American Sniper. But he’ll have to wait a little while yet for his Oscar. Whilst this year’s should be going to Bale, it’s heading straight for Rami Malek.

Christian Bale Vice

Totally transformed: Christian Bale becomes Dick Cheney in Adam McKay’s Vice.

Oscars 2019 Predictions – Best Makeup and Hairstyling, Best Costume Design

In today’s Oscar prediction post, we take a look at two technical categories that have always been closely linked.

89th Annual Academy Awards - Backstage

Best Makeup and Hairstyling

Will win: Vice
Should win:
Vice
Also nominated: Border, Mary Queen of Scots

Christian Bale has undergone a lot of transformations over the years for the sake of his craft, but none are as impressive as his metamorphosis into the much maligned former-Vice President Dick Cheney in Adam McKay’s Vice. What Greg Cannom, Kate Biscoe and Patricia Dehaney have achieved here is truly remarkable. They have allowed Bale, Sam Rockwell (as President George W. Bush), Amy Adams (as Lynne Cheney), Steve Carell (as Donald Rumsfeld) et al. to utterly inhabit and become their characters in what is undoubtedly some of the best makeup and hairstyling work that has been seen in recent years.

Vice

Christian Bale undergoes a total transformation in Vice. Unrecognisable as himself, he is instantly recognisable as the menacing Dick Cheney.

Best Costume Design

Will win: The Favourite
Should win: 
The Favourite
Also nominated: The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, Black Panther, Mary Poppins Returns, Mary Queen of Scots

Sandy Powell is no stranger to the Academy Awards. She already has three to her name and has even been nominated twice in this category this year, which is great testament to her dominance in this field. However, that’s not to say she doesn’t face tough opposition; Ruth E. Carter’s costumes for Black Panther have become iconic since the film hit our screens, and there’s a powerful opulence about Alexandra Byrne’s work on Mary Queen of Scots. But there is no competing against the glorious, extravagant Sandy Powell creations that can be seen in The Favourite.

The Favourite

Sandy Powell’s work on The Favourite is hotly tipped to pick up an Academy Award later this month.

Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) – Review

★★★

In the entire world, there is just one symbol more recognisable than Superman’s famous ‘S’ shield: the Christian cross. The Batman logo cannot be far behind. So famous, so iconic are the figures of Batman and Superman that their first on-screen meeting should, by all accounts, have made for a truly unforgettable film for the ages. Instead, these cultural giants have been underserved by something disappointingly inadequate. There is little remarkable or memorable about Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice, save for its mediocrity.

BVS1

Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016, Zack Snyder)

The main problem here is not conceptual – comic book fans have been dreaming about a clash between Batman and Superman for decades. The issue is that the conflict between these two heroes is not the primary interest of the film. Keen to pave the way for future films and to rival the success of Marvel, it is far more occupied with establishing a ‘DC Universe’ than it is with plot or integrity. The narrative begins as a globetrotting political thriller, asking heavy-handed but well-meaning questions about the nature of power and role of gods and heroes in society, yet quickly descends into an exercise of shoehorning in as many names and cameos as its mammoth two-and-a-half hour running time will allow. In one particular sequence, a number of DC icons are introduced one-by-one via e-mail attachment. It is so shockingly lazy and uncreative a scene that even the most diehard of fans cannot have been impressed. Pure spectacle is no substitute for plot. But it is, unfortunately, just a taste of the lack of imagination which underlies the film.

Of course, the problem with cramming Batman v. Superman with superfluous names and characters is that many of those who do belong in the film are painfully underused. Lois Lane and Alfred Pennyworth are just two examples of well-loved characters who feature at the peripheries of the plot and fail to make any meaningful impact – a dreadful waste of the respective talents of Amy Adams and Jeremy Irons. Meanwhile, far from being the villainous mastermind of the piece, the inclusion of Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg, in a bizarre Social Network-esque turn) comes across as nothing more than an afterthought.

BVS2.png

Batman v. Superman proves far more interested in setting up a DC Universe than it is in plot.

However, the most notable and unforgivable casualty of this error is none other than Superman himself. In Man of Steel, Henry Cavill showed rare potential; no actor will ever replace Christopher Reeve in hearts and minds as the Man of Tomorrow, but Cavill appeared ready to follow in his footsteps, to bring Superman to a new generation in a way that his predecessor, Brandon Routh, never did. But there are no signs of this promise in Batman v. Superman. There is none of the charm or wit which makes Superman Superman, nor is there any of the kindness.

However, one does have to wonder how much of this is to do with the script itself. Penned by Chris Terrio and David S. Goyer, it meanders about, drifting in and out of dream sequences and visions. Bizarrely, it sidelines Superman/Clark Kent for large chunks of the film and demands little more from him than scowling, chest puffing and sentimental moping. It presumes an inherent familiarity between the audience and Cavill’s Superman, forgetting that he is not yet the character whom the audience knows and loves. The film talks about him as the kind of superhero gentle enough to save a kitten from a tree, but this is a side it never actually shows. Throughout the whole two-and-a-half hour film Superman remains, effectively, a distant stranger. Perhaps this is intentional – the script does, after all, ponder the human reaction to an alien saviour – but it is a poor choice if so. Consequently, the few moments where the script yearns for empathy for the Man of Steel instead feel frustratingly hollow.

BVS3.jpg

Henry Cavill’s Superman is poorly served by a lacklustre script.

Yet, for all its flaws (and there are many), Batman v. Superman is not a ‘bad’ film. It is no Dark Knight. It is no Spider-man 2. But there is still plenty to like about it – certainly enough to render the vitriol that hoards of seething critics have directed towards it somewhat unfounded. Ben Affleck in particular is terrific. If Christian Bale’s Batman was young and angry, Affleck’s is world-weary, brutal, and morally ambiguous. This is the kind of superhero who thinks nothing of branding those he brings to justice with his own logo; Adam West and Michael Keaton’s Dark Knights were positively fluffy in comparison. And even though his eventual showdown with Superman does, admittedly, leave something to be desired, Affleck has proved all his naysayers wrong, providing an intelligent, refreshing take on a familiar character.

As Diana Prince/Wonder Woman, Gal Gadot is similarly excellent. Though she is seen only sparingly, she punctuates the film with moments of brilliance and elevates every scene she is in. Even Batman and Superman appear in awe of her, and rightly so. Laurence Fishburne, meanwhile, is given relatively little to do as Daily Planet editor Perry White but provides the film with the touches of humour of which it is so desperately in need.

BVS4.jpg

Ben Affleck’s Batman (or ‘Batfleck’) is one of Batman v. Superman‘s saving graces.

Ultimately, Batman v. Superman‘s biggest strength may well turn out to be its biggest weakness. When Zack Snyder decided he would bring together two characters as unversally beloved as Batman and Superman, he knew financial success was guaranteed. What he didn’t perhaps account for was that his audience would settle for nothing but the best. Expectations were sky high and the bar well and truly raised.

Batman v. Superman‘s greatest sin is that it is simply average. It is enjoyable enough but not outstanding. Had this been any other film, critics and audiences could well have forgiven it for this. But this is a film which promises so much but delivers, bar some saving graces, so little. The greatest irony is that it claims to herald a ‘Dawn of Justice’, yet provides none for two of the most loved comic book and film characters of all time.

Awards Season Special: The Big Short (2015)

★★★★

Eight short years ago, the world found itself in the grip of the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression. What had started in the upper echelons of the banking industry swiftly seeped its way into normal everyday life; businesses folded in their thousands, homes and jobs were lost in their millions. It was a global crisis felt on personal levels, and this is perhaps why The Big Short feels so relevant from the outset. It plays (very well) as a comedy, which is unsurprising given director Adam McKay’s credentials, but brimming beneath the surface is a seething and damning indictment of the corruption of the financial world.

THE BIG SHORT

Steve Carell and Ryan Gosling in Adam McKay’s The Big Short (2015)

Put simply, it is the story of the select few who saw the impending collapse of the US housing market, bet against it, and made their fortunes in the process. Whilst ordinarily the temptation to despise characters who make money out of others’ misery would be all too inviting, so loathsome is the world by which they are surrounded that one cannot help but rejoice in their eventual victory at the expense of the banks.

 

It certainly helps that this unlikely group of chancers is portrayed by a brilliant (for the most part) ensemble cast. Christian Bale, Brad Pitt, Steve Carell and Ryan Gosling are, of course, the most recognisable faces, but they are underpinned by impressive performances from the likes of Finn Witrock, John Magaro, Hamish Linklater and Rafe Spall. Gosling is, perhaps, the weak link in this star-studded chain. However, what his somewhat flat performance lacks is more than made up for by the superb Carell in his performance as hedge fund manager Mark Baum. He predictably gets the most laughs, but it is his handling of the film’s more sombre moments where he truly shines. There is one particular scene, in which a shocked Baum learns of the global nature of the crisis and realises what its repercussions will be, where he appears so horrified, so utterly defeated, that he almost seems to visibly age on screen. It is a genuinely brilliant performance – one that is perhaps easy to overlook because of its many comic moments – from an actor who continues to go from strength to strength.

To a degree, the film is preceded by Martin Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), which also offered audiences a glimpse into the machinations of Wall Street. However, whereas Scorsese’s epic unabashedly revels in the nauseating greed of abhorrent bankers, The Big Short thankfully makes no attempt to hide its disgust and contempt. What is also remarkably refreshing about The Big Short is that it doesn’t disguise the complexity of its subject matter. It knows that collateralised debt obligations, tranches, and ISDAs aren’t part of the vocabularies of standard filmgoers, but it refuses to simply dumb down. Instead, it invites the audience into this confusing , jargon-filled world with on-screen explanations and fourth-wall-breaking celebrity cameos. This approach will certainly not be to everybody’s tastes, and it does perhaps teeter close to the edge of being too self-aware – but it is at the very least original, and demonstrates McKay’s determination both to engage with his audience and treat them with intelligence.

151210_EM_TheBigShort

Christian Bale plays Dr. Michael Burry in The Big Short (2015)

The Big Short is a very funny film; it has a witty script and a cast of actors who know exactly how to pitch it. In the screening I attended, the laughter from the audience may as well have been a part of the soundtrack. The film works particularly well, though, because it knows when not to be funny. It knows that it is dealing with a very serious subject matter, and it uses the comedy as a tool with which to draw audiences in before hitting them with humbling, grave realities. The final product is a film which is as thought-provoking as it is entertaining – a very worthy contender for Best Picture at the upcoming Academy Awards.